Content
* Advice & Wealth Management
* Banking & Finance
* Branding
* Consumer Finance
* Employment & HR
* Government
* Mortgages & Lending
* Video
Services
* Mortgages & Lending
* Advice & Wealth Management
* Banking & Finance
 
« Velocity of Doubt HSBC’s Asian Pilgrimage »
Flash ‘In The Pan’ Gordon?

The long wait for Gordon ‘Gordo’ Brown getting into 10 Downing Street is finally over, but what impact will the new head of Her Majesty’s Government have on pensions and savings policy in the UK?

As chancellor, Brown was not a friend of the pensions industry. One of this first acts in office, back in 1997, was a £5 billion a year tax raid on pension funds.

It helped plug government finances, contributing to his reputation for fiscal stability, but arguably weakened UK pension schemes – just as life expectancies began to rise and long-term interest rates began to drop.

In addition, he has presided over a complex tax credit system that many believe discourages poorer savers from making retirement provisions.

And his refusal to compensate those who lost out from collapsed final salary schemes has led to long-running protests over the unfairness of government policy.

Brown’s replacement as chancellor, Alistair Darling, is widely seen as little more than a ‘Brownite yes-man’, who will enable the new PM to continue in his role as the most powerful figure in British domestic politics.

Peter Hain, the new minister for work and pensions, is not thought of as a welfare expert and will no doubt take time to come to grips with the complexities of the UK’s pension policy.

Looked at in this sense, it is hard to expect any radical changes in policy in a post-Blair era.

On the other hand, Brown is a skilful and heavyweight politician. He will not want to be remembered as someone who inherited the top job and then lost it at the next election.

So he may well be prepared to change course in order to boost his party’s appeal. And as he has previously demonstrated, he is prepared to make bold moves to wrong foot opponents and show his independence.

A proper settlement for the festering sore of 100,000 or more employees who lost their pensions in what should have been safe company schemes could be one starting point.

Brown as PM might approve an aid package that as chancellor he would have balked at, and moves on issues like this could be part of a general ‘feel good’ agenda.

Retirement income could be an issue to win over older voters. Annuities are unpopular, and making it easier for people to control their income in retirement could be part of a late spring-cleaning.

It would not necessarily require major changes, but a willingness to talk with product providers to find out what they need to develop more flexible and innovative annuity type products, although there are signs this is starting to happen.

At the very least, there is now the opportunity for a fresh start.

It is really up to the new ministers and their civil servants to decide what should be done to improve pension savings - the new Prime Minister will, one suspects, be more occupied with issues such as Iraq, the health service, education and law and order.

Bookmark and Share
July 3rd, 2007 Posted in Advice & Wealth Management, Consumer Finance, Government, Mortgages & Lending
Comment:

I read somewhere else that UK pensioners were forced to use annuities rather than Australian-style market linked pensions. I didn’t know whether to trust it or not as the site didn’t appear to be overly reliable in other aspects.

This article briefly hinted at the same thing.

So is it true that UK pensioners have to invest in annuities? Is it 100% of the portfolio or only a portion of it?

Commenter: Incredulous  Post Time:July 3rd, 2007

The rules for UK pensions in effect still require at least 75% of a money purchase (e.g. personal pension) pension fund to be used to purchase an annuity by the age of 75. If the purchase of an annuity is delayed beyond this, then the fund becomes an “alternatively secured pension” – or ASP. ASP is a form of income drawdown but with a government imposed minimum income amount which must be taken from the fund and this “income” will be taxed as income in the same way as the annuity is taxed as income. There is a tax disincentive for those who delay buying an annuity If the owner of the pension dies after the age of 75 and they have not purchased an annuity i.e. their funds are still classified as an ASP, then the fund/capital is taxed up to 70% of the fund. The 2 taxes involved are UK inheritance tax (40%) and an “unauthorised payment charge” – 30%. These rules have been dreamt up by the current government to prevent wealthy people from avoiding paying inheritance tax and to encourage people to buy an annuity by the time they reach 75. For those who have large pension funds, plenty of other investments and don’t care about leaving money to their families, ASP is probably still a good idea. But with the average pension fund in the UK standing at approx £40,000 (!) – and that may be generous – the decision as to whether or not you buy an annuity is largely academic . The UK pensions industry is currently trying to come up with different products to offer in place of annuities but anything that looks to be advantageous from a tax point of view, gets pounced on by the current government and the rules get changed – nightmare for those of us trying to give advice.

Commenter: salmol  Post Time:July 4th, 2007

Name (or alias if you prefer to remain anonymous) (required)
(required)


Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

IFSA-CoreData Investor Sentiment Index
Latest Research
© COREDATA